🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for using excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and later bin them for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.